Next Monday is the 7th Annual day of .net with Scott Guthrie. I’ve been doing this event for many years and this year (for the first time) I’ll be asking for a feedback / eval form to be turned in at the end of the day. In true community fashion, I would like to ask your feedback on my feedback form.
Please be constructive. I know that filling out forms seems silly on a one-by-one basis, but collectively the stats can really help, and I will personally read and evaluate each form, so it's a great way to give each person their own voice.
I’ve put hundreds of hours into getting this event off the ground, with the venue, sponsors, give-a-ways, etc. So to make it better next year, this is the form I’ve put together.
Am I missing anything? Should I add or remove anything? Please leave comments below.
Thank You!
Thank You!
Thank You!
6 comment(s)
Nice form!!
Scott, you might consider adding the question 'did this event meet my expectations' in addition to the one of 'Was I satisisfied?'. Two different potential outcomes there. Also, under the conference center, how about a question for sound (either seperate or part of screens,,,). Other than that, this looks good.
I fixed Tim's mispelling - Thanks everyone for the Tweet Feedback #AZGroups
Reverse order of Bad - Great ('Great' should be first)
Remove 'Boring' option (does not always apply).
An improvement for next year... Since you decided to use these to give out prizes at the end, don't forget to _ask for the respondent's name_ for that purpose. If I'm already on the list, I wouldn't fill out the form asking to have my contact details added. However, I would have added my name on the top to get some sweet shwag.
You are so, so, so, so right. I only wish we'd have gotten this feedback before the event. Of course no one knew (not even me) that I would pull the winner from eval forms. It was off the cuff.
I made the decision because the list I was using for the Rouletter Spin-To-Win game, had all the no shows. So since we had so many things to give-a-way, the feedback forms were the best/fastest option.
@Eric I agree - I've learned - and I'll do better next time.